One of the most interesting (and perhaps unexpected) political developments over the past 12 months has been the strong use of the Alberta government’s MLA recall powers. At the time of this writing, Alberta has 26 active recall petitions, including one for Premier Danielle Smith.
When the recall legislation was passed in 2021 under Jason Kenney’s government, it wasn’t clear how often or extensively it would be used. The threshold is pretty high. Citizen-initiated petitions have 90 days to gain the signatures of constituents, accounting for “60 percent of the total number of votes cast in the most recent election” in a given riding. Signatures can only be obtained by registered canvassers. If the signatures are reviewed and found to be legitimate, a vote must then be held within four months on whether the member is actually recalled. If an elected official is successfully recalled, then a byelection is triggered.
Yet, despite this, individuals and groups have seized on its powers to challenge provincial politicians. And the government is now saying it’s being misused. Its spokespeople assert that recall campaigns are “being weaponized by special interest groups,” and while no changes to the recall legislation are impending, the government appears to be considering these in the future.
It’s not just the UCP government either. Alberta NDP leader Naheed Nenshi has pledged to repeal the Recall Act if his party wins the next provincial election.
That’s why it’s important to have a conversation about the recall power and advocate for it not just in Alberta and B.C., the only jurisdictions with such legislation, but across Canada. Getting rid of recall would be a mistake. It would represent a diminishment of one of the few pro-democratic policies in the country.
Citizens should have the right to recall
Recalls are an important tool for democratic self-defence, giving citizens the “opportunity to legitimately withdraw the mandates of non-democratic politicians,” including elected officials who contradict the wishes of the people they represent.
Citizens have few options to act in a democracy. If you disagree with your representative, you can wait until the next election and potentially vote them out. But what if the election is years away?
You can still send an email, write a letter, make a phone call, or request a meeting. You may or may not reach your representative, and if you do, they could dismiss you or tell you their hands are tied. You could protest, but that’s also no guarantee of influencing the government. Recall power gives citizens a concrete way to take action.
Alberta’s recall petitions, despite likely failing to remove any officials, are a vital democratic tool. Currently, there are 26 active petitions in the province, including one for Premier Danielle Smith. While the government and opposition leader express concerns about misuse and potential repeal, recall empowers citizens to hold elected officials accountable between elections. The high threshold in Alberta is seen as a potential barrier, but the existence of the power itself is beneficial for democratic self-defence and improving perceptions of legitimacy. Wider adoption of recall legislation across Canada would be sensible.
Should citizens have the power to recall elected officials between elections?
Are recall petitions a 'weapon' for special interests, or a legitimate democratic tool?
Could recall legislation make politicians too afraid to make unpopular but necessary decisions?
Comments (6)
Premier Smith and her party have sounded like whiners. They should have said, “this is what we wanted and we accept the challenge of these petitions”. I live in one of the ridings with a petition and as much as I dislike my MLA (he refuses to answer any emails, no matter what, and has always been this way) the petition will most likely fail. Apathy is rampant.