{"id":62828,"date":"2023-11-17T12:13:02","date_gmt":"2023-11-17T17:13:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thehub.ca\/?p=62828"},"modified":"2024-02-14T08:33:17","modified_gmt":"2024-02-14T13:33:17","slug":"rudyard-griffiths-and-sean-speer-the-road-will-be-bumpy-but-the-future-of-news-is-bright","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thehub.ca\/2023-11-17\/rudyard-griffiths-and-sean-speer-the-road-will-be-bumpy-but-the-future-of-news-is-bright\/","title":{"rendered":"Hub Editorial: The road will be bumpy but the future of news is bright"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

The news media in Canada is in crisis. Policy responses to date are failing to solve for the information that citizens need to make informed decisions about important issues and debates. <\/em>The Future of News\u00a0series brings together leading practitioners, scholars, and thinkers to imagine new business models, policy responses, and journalistic content that can support a dynamic future for news in Canada.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Next Tuesday marks the fifth anniversary of the Trudeau government\u2019s fourth Fall Economic Statement<\/a>, which set out, among other initiatives, nearly $600 million in tax incentives and other subsidies for Canadian news outlets. With the exception of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation\u2019s annual subsidy, this five-year infusion represented one of the most significant allocations of public resources to Canadian journalism in the country\u2019s history. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

By coincidence, Tuesday will also mark the release of the Trudeau government\u2019s tenth Fall Economic Statement in the face of mounting calls<\/a> to expand the spending measures announced five years ago. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s been an eventful half-decade in terms of industry developments and government policymaking. The legacy media has experienced a significant contraction including a 14 percent reduction<\/a> in the number of working journalists between 2016 and 2021 alone. These job losses have been partly offset by the rise of start-up outlets like The Hub<\/em>, but there\u2019s little doubt that the overall industry is smaller and faces diminished capacity relative to 2018.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Government policy has also evolved over this period including the enactment of the controversial Online News Act<\/em>, which sought to mandate payments from Meta and Google to Canadian news outlets and has instead chased the former out of the market and is reportedly<\/a> at serious risk of doing the same with the latter. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The net effect of these various developments has left the industry in a highly uncertain position. The legacy media still faces serious structural challenges. The start-up media has lost access to key sources of its growth. It represents quite a backdrop for Tuesday\u2019s Fall Economic Statement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

“We\u2019re confident that this process will work. The market will, by and large, sort itself out.<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019re not really interested however in speculating about the Fall Economic Statement or relitigating the case for or against the Online News Act<\/em>. Our aim is to look forward. It\u2019s to reset the public policy debate about the future of news rooted in a clear understanding of the nature and scale of the problem and to ultimately set out practical policy recommendations that support the transition to a sustainable news media sector in Canada. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That\u2019s why we are proud to launch a new series at The Hub<\/em> that we\u2019re calling The Future of News. Over the next several months, we\u2019ll publish a steady stream of opinion commentary, long-form reporting, and podcast episodes that involve a diverse group of practitioners, scholars, and thinkers from Canada and around the world focused on a set of key questions: what is the problem to be solved in the news media, what are the relative roles of the market and government to solve it, and what is the best mix of public policies to ultimately solve it? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Contributors to The Future of News series will be free to interpret these questions based on their own experiences and viewpoints. We\u2019ll seek to bring a plurality of perspectives to bear on the subject\u2014including legacy media voices and voices from the upstart world, those who support a more interventionist response and those who are more inclined to defer to market forces, and even exponents and opponents of the CBC alike. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Having co-founded and now led a start-up news organization for more than two-and-a-half years, we\u2019ve come to some of our own conclusions about these questions. While we don\u2019t seek to influence the analysis and commentary from the series\u2019 contributors, we thought that, as we kick off the series, we owe The Hub\u2019s<\/em> readers an explanation of how we\u2019ve come to think about these issues. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our starting point is that news and information are crucial inputs into Canada\u2019s civic and democratic life. We have a collective interest in the quantity and quality of news content in our society in a way that\u2019s different than most market-provided goods or services. There isn\u2019t a public interest in how many luxury handbags the economy produces. These are substitutable goods that may reflect individual preferences but cannot make the claim of a public good. News and information\u2014particularly in a democracy\u2014are different. It\u2019s a key means by which we hold democratic governments accountable and exercise our rights and responsibilities as democratic citizens. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The news media sector is going through a period of significant disruption primarily because the prevailing business model, which relied heavily on advertising revenues to sustain its operations, has been superseded by broader market developments and evolving consumer preferences. This isn\u2019t a classic \u201cmarket failure\u201d in the sense that the market hasn\u2019t malfunctioned per se. Nobody forced the sector to become overdependent on a single revenue source which made it highly vulnerable to market changes. That was the result of industry choices that in hindsight were narrow and short-sighted. But it still doesn\u2019t change that the consequences have been significant or shouldn’t be a cause for concern among policymakers or the Canadian public as a whole. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet even then there\u2019s a tendency to overfocus on the destructive part of the process of \u201ccreative destruction\u201d and to neglect the creative part. This risks missing a lot of exciting experimentation and innovation that\u2019s currently occurring within news outlets like The Hub<\/em> that will eventually be responsible for pulling the industry out of its present doldrums. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are various industry-led efforts underway to figure out how to deliver high-quality news and information in the new market environment. They range from innovations within legacy media brands to new start-ups with business models that include subscription-driven financing, single proprietors, venture capital, and even charitable funding. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s a process of trial and error. There will invariably be stops and starts. Not all will ultimately be successful\u2014in fact, most will not. But it\u2019s a case of markets doing precisely what markets do, which is to enable a two-way conversation between entrepreneurs and consumers to determine the types of business models that can sustain themselves according to market terms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We recognize that this may be messy and difficult. Well-regarded companies and quality journalists will face dislocation. It\u2019s even quite possible that the industry is rationalized such that its footprint is permanently smaller. It\u2019s also likely that it\u2019s re-organized along more decentralized lines than we\u2019ve experienced over the past several decades. There will probably be fewer large, dominant players with convergent business models. Instead, the new industry equilibrium will probably involve a greater mix of for-profit and non-profit business models, comprehensive and niche content models, and international, national, and local scopes of coverage that aggregate up to meet the needs of consumers. But we\u2019re confident that this process will work. The market will, by and large, sort itself out. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This perspective distinguishes us from the alarmists who believe that the market has fundamentally malfunctioned in such a way that necessitates a large-scale policy intervention that extends across the entire news media sector. Just because the industry is going through a process of change doesn\u2019t mean that Ottawa ought to turn every private news outlet into a mini-CBC that\u2019s shielded from market forces. There\u2019s nothing written in stone by the hand of God that the National Post<\/em>, Toronto Star<\/em>, or even the CBC must exist in perpetuity. It\u2019s certainly not the job of public policy to guarantee that they do. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The short-term challenges facing journalism are ones that entrepreneurs and innovators are actively working to solve.”<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

That said, we\u2019d similarly distinguish ourselves from those who believe that markets alone can solve the challenges in news media\u2014particularly in the short term. If one starts from the premise that we have a collective interest in the quantity and quality of news and information in our society, then there may be a role for public policy to help smooth the transition from the current bout of market disruption to a sustainable news media sector however it reconfigures itself.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We believe that there\u2019s probably a targeted role for public policy to help during this transitory period\u2014with a particular focus on areas that may be underserved by the market including local news, the North, and Indigenous communities. These arguably represent genuine market failures for which there may even prove to be an ongoing role for public policy to support the production and distribution of news and information. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That brings us back to the key questions that we set out earlier. If we were to answer them directly, we\u2019d do so as follows: <\/p>\n\n\n\n