This past fall’s federal budget triggered a predictable round of frustration from some First Nations leaders. As a former elected chief councillor of the Haisla Nation, I understand that reaction well; for years, we’ve watched federal budgets more often announce cuts than commitments to Indigenous affairs. But if there’s anything I learned over 16 years of serving the Haisla Nation Council in various capacities, it’s that our future will not be built by the federal budget.
Despite Budget 2025 committing $141.4 billion in new spending over the next five years, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) called it a “missed opportunity.” The AFN’s issue: Budget 2025 came billions of dollars short of the investments required to close the infrastructure gap in First Nations by 2030. The Liberal government has also taken heat for delivering the first budget in over a decade without a dedicated Indigenous section, and its perceived shift away from social programs and towards economic reconciliation.
I grew up in Kitamaat Village, where I spent most of my childhood with my grandparents, Cecilia and Gilbert Smith. We didn’t have much. I know what it’s like to grow up in a place and time where every dollar matters. The band and most families in our community lived paycheque to paycheque. It seemed like Indian Affairs was always hovering, with a consistent message: you can’t be trusted to govern yourselves and manage your own affairs.
Over time, this unique brand of paternalism seeped into the mindset of our membership—generation after generation born with the understanding that poverty is the status quo. In our minds, for too long, Ottawa was the only solution.
Things turned around after Ellis Ross was elected as a Haisla councillor in the mid-2000s. He started to change the conversation there, slowly but steadily shifting the narrative to one of economic self-determination through LNG development. Our nation had gone from facing threats from Indian Affairs to being placed under remedial management to signing our first Impact Benefit Agreement in 2009. It wasn’t perfect by any means, but it was a significant first step in moving ourselves out of a dependency mindset to one of self-determination.
Crystal Smith, a former Haisla Nation chief councillor, argues that First Nations must shift from relying on federal budgets to actively pursuing their own economic self-determination. While acknowledging the need to hold Ottawa accountable for its obligations, she emphasizes that true progress comes from First Nations acting as proponents, negotiating commercial deals, and building their own revenue streams.
Using the Haisla Nation’s transformation through LNG development as an example, Smith advocates for a mindset shift from dependency to prosperity, urging First Nations to leverage their strengths and take control of their future rather than waiting for government programs.
The article argues First Nations should focus on self-determination over waiting for federal budgets. What are the biggest hurdles to this shift?
The Haisla Nation's shift towards economic self-determination through LNG development is presented as a success. What lessons can other First Nations draw from this experience?
The author stresses holding governments accountable for fiduciary obligations while also pivoting away from reliance on budgets. How can First Nations balance these two approaches?
Comments (7)
Self reliance is the key to prosperity for anyone and everyone. If only Canadians understood this.