Canada has a serious competitiveness problem, and more government is not the answer. Unfortunately, it will likely take more pain before the country fully awakens to this fact and is actually prepared to make the significant policy shifts that will fix our potentially great country.
Why Canadians love big government and regulation
Canada is effectively controlled by Eastern voters, especially in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, which have 200 (58 percent) of the country’s 343 parliamentary seats. Industry in Eastern Canada is dominated by oligopoly structures and heavy regulation protecting them from international competition, primarily from American entities.
Think of the banking, insurance, dairy, auto, airline, railway, media, and telecommunications sectors, all of which include few participants but endless regulatory protection from global entities.
Canadian banks comprise roughly one-third of our TSX market capitalization. All of our big five banks have global operations, with the largest, Royal Bank, operating in most regions of the world. Yet for the most recent fiscal year, the Royal Bank reported that over 70 percent of its $20.4 billion profit was attributable to its Canadian operations (per note 26 RBC 2025 F/S).
With a more competitive environment, our top six Canadian banks would not control over 90 percent of the domestic market’s banking assets. According to Trent University finance professor Dr. Jie Zhang, Canada’s higher capital ratio requirements of 13.3 percent of risk-weighted assets (in contrast to 7 percent required by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board) make it more difficult for U.S. banks to compete in Canada.
According to a study prepared for Statistics Canada, as of 2021, there are over 300,000 federal regulations affecting businesses. Add to this our education and health systems, which are primarily government-funded and controlled, and Canada is one of the most government-dominated countries in the Western world. An estimated 4.6 million people (out of a working population of approximately 21.2 million) are employed by some level of government.
Canada’s love for big government and extensive regulation is hindering its competitiveness. Dominated by Eastern Canadian voters and protected industries, the country suffers from slow GDP growth and poor performance in key sectors like health care, despite high government spending. Canada’s collectivist “peace, order, and good government” contrasts with the U.S.’s focus on individual liberty, suggesting a shift towards efficiency, reduced regulation, and private sector growth is necessary for Canada to regain its former economic standing. This transformation, however, may require further economic pain before Canadians embrace necessary policy changes.
Does Canada's 'peace, order, and good government' philosophy hinder economic competitiveness?
How do Eastern Canadian voting patterns influence the country's economic policies?
What specific policy shifts does the article propose to boost Canada's economy?
Comments (6)
I would imagine much of this essay is preaching to the choir. The rest of the media and politicians on the left easily spin these arguments in the ways everyone has heard before. I don’t know how we get more people to believe this vision. The author mentioned the typically protected industries : banking, insurance, dairy, auto, airline, railway, media, and telecommunications sectors – but I don’t see any federal leaders proposing substantial changes to these industries. I keep saying that we need a Thatcher type – someone brave and bold. Carney and Poilievre are plenty smart, it is bravery they lack. MOUs and tweaks to the TFSA are not going to cut it.