FREE three month
trial subscription!

Howard Anglin: Leonard Cohen, Canada’s unforgettable poet of forgettable poetry

Commentary

Leonard Cohen is photographed in Toronto Saturday, Feb. 4, 2006. Aaron Harris/CP Photo.

On Hydra, I fell out of love with Leonard Cohen's poetry

You would think you would remember a conversation with Leonard Cohen, but I remember almost nothing of mine. I assume we talked about Montreal, because it was the summer after I graduated from high school in Victoria and before I moved to Montreal for university, and I can’t think what else the 60-year-old singer and an 18-year-old student would have had in common.

My summer job was running a hot dog stand, and he was in town for a concert promoting his latest album, The Future. The album had sparked one of the periodic revivals in public attention that marked Cohen’s career, and without that recent media coverage I might not have recognised the rather formal older man who approached me to ask if I knew where he could get a lemonade.

Before that summer, I’d known Cohen as a name attached to a much younger face on the covers of old books in the Oak Bay library’s modest Canadian poetry section, and on the back cover of Flowers for Hitler, his third volume of poetry published in 1964, which I had taken from my father’s bookshelf to read at the hot dog stand that day.

Cohen must have been surprised to find a copy of his book on a Victoria street corner because he invited me to join him for that lemonade. So I moved the cooked hot dogs to the warming shelf and walked across the street to the Contempo Cafe. I’m pretty certain we didn’t talk about his book, which he had written on the Greek island of Hydra in the long summer of 1963. Asking a writer about his writing seemed impertinent to me then, as it does still.

There is not much of Hydra in Cohen’s writing—surprisingly little, in fact–—but every biographer says that there is much of the island behind it. Greece, they say (and he said so too from time to time) provided the right mix of estrangement and encouragement that he needed to outgrow two limitations: the limitation of growing up Canadian and the limitation of the written word.

Although he wore many outfits in his career—Bohemian linen in Greece, denim and leather in New York, monks robes in California, trim dark suits on the road—he was never far spiritually from Montreal and he compensated for it by distancing himself physically. Cohen needed the physical isolation of Hydra to write as much as he needed the island’s rag-tag audience of artists to encourage him to compose and sing.

I split this last September between the islands of Hydra and Corfu, and I wondered if Cohen would have been happier on Corfu away from the expatriate writers and painters who crowded Hydra’s small harbour croisette. More a commune than a community, Charmian Clift, the Australian doyenne of the group, described her fellow artists as “insurgents all who have rebelled against the station in which it pleased God to place them.”

A friend on Hydra, Demetri Leousi, told Cohen he was the first Jew to own property on the island. How different then it was both from his middle-class childhood in Montreal and from Corfu, with its old Jewish quarter, where 2,000 people were harried by the occupying German army and hounded onto boats bound for the death camps of Eastern Europe.

Would Cohen, I wonder, have written Flowers for Hitler differently in a place haunted by Hitler’s ghosts? Would he have written it at all, or would he have become a different writer amid Corfu’s crumbling Venetian splendour and semi-tropical floral abundance?

Unlike Corfu, which is lush and tree-tangled and saturated in history, barren Hydra looks and feels like a blank canvas. The arid emptiness of Hydra’s rock and scrub no doubt suited an artist who craved asceticism. Corfu is cosmopolitan and myth-layered and Cohen was already both of those things by nature; he might have drowned in Corfu’s real and imagined lushness.

It is impossible to visit Hydra without thinking of Cohen. For Canadians of a certain age or disposition, Hydra has been our fantasy of escape. While we bundle and trudge through long winters, the island shimmers somewhere over the horizon, impossibly hot and blue. It is there just off-screen in Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr Leonard Cohen, the 1965 movie that followed the poet around Montreal on one of his annual trips home. It is Shangri-La and Brigadoon, and Cohen was our guide.

During my first few days on the island I sought out reminders of Cohen: his house, the squares, cafes, and swimming coves captured in black and white photographs in magazine spreads and in grainy colour home movie footage in the 2019 documentary Marianne & Leonard: Words of Love. He was my connection through home to the island. But after a couple of days it started to feel uncomfortably voyeuristic.

I hadn’t come to pay homage to Cohen. If I had visited in my 20s I probably would have tried to steal whatever it was he had found there, but I’m too old to syphon another man’s ambition. Besides, I’ve lived in enough literary cities to know that seeing the places where a writer lived adds nothing to their work. Re-reading a few of Cohen’s poems on Hydra, I got nothing I didn’t get when I’d read them in Victoria or Montreal. Less, even.

After that, I found myself trying to avoid Cohen. I hiked a narrow path into the mountains to the remote whitewashed monasteries (hadn’t Cohen said he avoided them?). I left late when the sun was high and the air was heavy, and my white linen shirt stuck to my damp skin, so I unbuttoned it. An old woman driving an ancient donkey in the other direction approached me and burst into a toothless cackle. “Zorba! Zorba!” she sang and did a little twirl with her hands above her head.

At the monastery, the caretaker served me cold water from a cistern carved deep into the rock. I liked this Hydra, away from the crowds and Cohen. I decided that it was more interesting than whatever he may have left here. After all, it was Cohen who sought out Hydra; Hydra didn’t seek out Cohen. The isalnd didn’t need him then and doesn’t need him now.

But it is surprisingly hard to avoid a fellow countryman on a small island, even if he is dead. Another day I walked along the cliff path that leads out of town for movie night on the beach at Kamini Bay. I ate free souvlaki as the sun took its time setting over the glassy sea. The screening was of the first episode of a new television series called So Long, Marianne, which had been shot on the island. It was interesting to see how they had recreated the island in the 1960s, but otherwise it left me cold.

I got enough of the younger Cohen’s poetry when I too was young, and his later poetry really wasn’t very good. The last collection he published, the Book of Longing, is bloated, full of silly ditties and self-indulgent, often pornographic doodles. It reminds me of John Lennon’s chapbooks, which no one would read if they hadn’t been written by John Lennon. Even the better poems feel like Cohen, alert to the beat of time, brought them out of the writer’s dark room underdeveloped.

A piece like “Alexandra Leaving,” a play on Cavafy’s “The God Abandons Antony,” might have been better—even good—with more work, but in this state it’s more of an insult than an homage to the original. Better to read Cavafy raw, especially in Greece, and save Cohen’s thin late verse for cramped Canadian cafes, or forget it altogether. I bought a used collection of 20th-century Greek poetry at the Hydra Book Club, and for the rest of my trip I read only that.

In its review of a posthumous collection of verse and notebook jottings that Cohen was rushing to complete before he died, the New York Times was scathing.”Cohen was not a poet who accidentally became a lyricist; he was a lyricist who for years fooled himself into thinking he was a poet”’ Re-reading his poetry this month, I’m convinced that’s right. There is a reason his poetry is lightly anthologised, at least relative to his fame. He is our unforgettable poet of mostly forgettable poetry. His songs still carry an ineffable power, but I don’t think I’ll ever read his poetry again.

Howard Anglin

Howard Anglin is a doctoral student at Oxford University. He was previously Deputy Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Principal Secretary to the Premier of Alberta, Jason Kenney, and a lawyer in New York, London, and Washington, DC.

Lianne Bell: Understanding JD Vance

Commentary

Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance speaks at a campaign event, Aug. 7, 2024, in Shelby Township, Mich. Alex Brandon/AP Photo.

Last week’s vice-presidential debate between JD Vance and Tim Walz was an important moment. For the general public, this was the first real political introduction to the man chosen by Donald Trump as his running mate. For those of us watching his career closer, it was a validation that one of us had made it to the biggest stage. Vance, made famous for his searing memoir chronicling his upbringing in white working-class America, came off as underestimated; he was smarter and his performance calmer than expected. That should not be a surprise. He has proven to be a striver willing to do anything and say anything to advance beyond his station, for better or worse. I’ve known Vance-types my whole life. I was raised with them.

I miss Greenbush, where I grew up. Sometimes I close my eyes and go there. I go back to the everyday moments that formed me. I walk down the tree-covered dirt road to my best friend’s place dragging my hands through the tall grass. Or I’ll get in my old beat-up car and drive the back roads with my brother singing Meatloaf as loud as we can.

When I first moved to the city I dreamed of going home almost every day. I missed my friends. I missed the culture that I was raised in. I missed how straightforward and casual the people were. But Thomas Wolfe was right. You can’t go home. Leaving necessitates transformation. My parents divorced and sold our little farm. A lady lives there now raising pigs on the same hallowed earth that raised me. No one waves at me when I drive down those old dirt roads, the memory of me long faded away. My family is flung to the corners of the country. Many of my friends have moved or moved on. But so have I.

Much like Vance, the transition from hillbilly to the professional class demanded I change. That I became more refined. When I was first dating my husband and we were getting to know each other I asked him a question that any self-respecting girl would want to know: what modifications would you do to your car? Lowering it perhaps, subwoofers, underlighting—I was prepared to engage in any number of answers except the one he gave me. He stared at me blankly, never having been asked this before, or even considering it. He said: “How it comes from the factory.” Fitting into this new urban middle-class existence was going to be difficult.

It’s been 15 years since I moved away. I still miss it. I miss who I used to be. Who I am under the wallpaper of fitting into my new surroundings. Having the same experiences as my friends. Being totally understood. Belonging.

An excerpt of Hillbilly Elegy, Vance’s memoir, was floating around on the internet not long after it was published when I came across it and gave it a read. It struck me to my very core and I had to read more. I immediately downloaded the ebook to listen to while I was driving down Highway 2 to Calgary. I’m not much for crying but as the miles passed tears streamed down my face. Vance and I didn’t have the exact same upbringing. But we sure did share a lot of the same themes. Listening to his story, I felt deeply legitimized. I had never really shied away from talking about my upbringing but it never felt like something to be proud of. But I was in fact proud. Profoundly proud of my family. My family had overcome challenges most families couldn’t even comprehend. American or not, it felt like my family’s experience now had a mainstream voice. And an articulate, highly educated voice at that.

I started following Vance when he did the morning show circuit. It was early in the Trump era. Many of the people I love dearly were and are die-hard supporters of Trump. At best my feelings about his presidency were mixed. It was hard to ignore that he seemed to be championing people like my family and my community. He spoke like us, he talked about issues that mattered to us. He had solutions to our problems we could get behind. He showed up.

Watching Trump level the elites has been intensely satisfying. For years the elites, the people with their hands on the levers of power, had lined their pockets at the expense of the working class. Working-class job after working-class job shipped overseas while corporate bonuses became eye-wateringly high. All the while the elites mocked us. Mocking the things we valued. Suggesting impractical “solutions” like why don’t we just move for a better job, forgetting about all of the community we are connected to. Trump promised to bring back the jobs. He promised retribution. And he did so while mocking and taunting the elites the whole way. The people who had had us under their thumb were maybe getting a small sense of how it felt. How it felt to be at the whim of someone else. Maybe it was a hollow promise, but I didn’t care. It came close to satiating the intense bitterness I felt from a lifetime of having my community degraded.

He did all this—and he took advantage of us.

It was hard to be blind to Trump playing to our bitterness, that his goal was to engage us emotionally. That what he promised seemed unlikely to happen. It was clear that Trump was playing to a dark side, that he was directing our bitterness to other people and groups. Vance at one time articulated this disconnect with Trump perfectly. He called out Trump for manipulating our communities. For appealing to its worst instincts instead of calling for the best version of ourselves. He gave voice to the concerns many in our community had about a Trump presidency. Vance was neither condescending nor judgmental towards those who supported Trump but aimed his arrows at the man himself.

When Vance decided to run for office I understood what he was saying. Anyone who lives in a rusted-out little town knows what is about to happen. When the smart kid down the street starts talking about their ambitions, ambitions that can not be fulfilled in your little one traffic light town. There would be no more shotgunning beers at bush parties. No more playing cards at your grandma’s kitchen table. They were leaving. And leaving means a transformation. Leaving behind the friends and the streets that formed us. And once you leave you can never really go back. Your little town will look different, and you will be different. You watch the transformation happen with both a twinge of loss and a sense of pride.

To win, Vance was going to have to embrace the bright lights of the Trump campaign. It was the only path to victory. Talking sense to and for us hillbillies would be no more. Instead, he would have to use the language of the Trump narrative. No more thoughtful reflections on our community. Now it’s the hyperbole of the former president and his most antagonistic impulses. Nonsense about women without children. Cartoonish talk of people eating cats. Much of what I initially admired about Vance has been wallpapered over to achieve the successes he is aiming for.

Even if I cringe at it, I understand. Anyone who has ever tried to be more than their present self understands. Transformation is ugly. There will be regrets. Sacrifices that will leave lasting wounds. And only you in the dark part of your heart will ever be able to weigh the costs and decide if it was worth it.

When I watch Vance take the stage these days, a big part of me is proud. It signals to the world that my own ambitions are possible. That getting a payday loan is not the sign of a future without possibility. It signals the power of the love and belief of a family member like Vance’s grandmother. That the administrative maze laid for us to get lost in can be overcome. There is a path, and Vance has walked that path for the rest of us.

I just hope when Vance goes home and walks by his grandmother’s home that he thinks of us. He thinks of us still in our hometowns trying to make it work, trying to build a life we can be proud of. And I hope he thinks of us trying awkwardly to fit into our new life desperately hoping we’ll finally feel like we belong.

I think that’s still possible. The Vance of the vice-presidential debate was like a real person and not someone doing his best Trump impression. He was articulate and respectful. His debate opponent was clearly flustered, no doubt having prepared to spar with a bombastic caricature.

I, for one, am optimistic about what this might mean for the future. That the old Vance I connected to in his memoir is not only still there but can actually succeed on the biggest stage. That the deranged style of our politics today will recede and be replaced by such an advocate. At least that’s what this hillbilly is hoping for.

Lianne Bell

Lianne Bell is from Greenbush, Ontario and is currently an Alberta political commentator.

00:00:00
00:00:00