It’s not economics or culture conservatives should be concerned with—it’s both

Commentary

A Canadian flag at Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s rally in Oshawa, Ont., April 3, 2025. Laura Proctor/The Canadian Press.

On Reagan and the path forward for conservatives

Recent online debates sparked by younger conservatives have raised interesting questions about classical liberalism, Ronald Reagan’s legacy, and the best course of action to achieve common conservative goals.

Reagan is fondly remembered by older conservatives for his liberal, free-market, small-government policies, but his more enduring legacy may be his moral clarity and faith-based values—his economic beliefs, and his cultural values. I think modern conservatism needs to find a way to convene in this space—a renewed fusionism—supporting liberal economics and embracing conservative cultural values. Though Reagan’s proposed constitutional amendment for voluntary school prayer ultimately failed, the deeper schism came after his presidency, when the GOP, flying high on the Cold War victory and supply-side economics, foolishly ignored William F. Buckley Jr.’s frequent warnings. It ceded the cultural base that Reagan had built.

“The libertarian impulse, while vital to conservatism’s economic soul, must not be allowed to corrode its moral foundations,” Buckley wrote in 1986.

By the late 1980s, conservatives had largely set aside their public views on religion and turned their focus solely on free market economics and small-government policy, which in large part aligned with progressive secular cultural aspirations. Untethered to their faith-based past, conservatives abandoned their traditional role as a grounding cultural force for society.

Comments (0)

Log in to comment
Go to article
00:00:00
00:00:00