There has been a lot of heartache south of the border over the death of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in newsrooms, but the emphasis on hiring specified minorities remains as intact and intense as ever in Canada.
Pointing to layoffs at CBS News, NBC News, McClatchy, Axios, and Teen Vogue, the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) last week tied job losses to U.S. President Donald Trump’s erasure of DEI initiatives. Not only has he dismantled DEI programs that are within his scope through executive orders, but Trump has also gone a step further and empowered his attorney general to scrutinize private companies for “egregious and discriminatory” practices like DEI. All this, Trump insists, is a return to “merit-based” employment even while he outrageously and directly meddles in the makeup of his nation’s newsrooms.
Riddhi Setty, a Delacorte fellow at CJR, reported that every producer laid off from CBS Evenings Plus was a person of colour, while “everyone granted an alternate role was white.”
CJR also quoted Versha Sharma, who stepped down as editor in chief of Teen Vogue, lamenting the dismantling of her “team of young Black, Asian, queer, and trans staffers who are passionate, whip smart and consistently pushed impactful storytelling forward…. Many of them are now without jobs.”
NBC’s pledge to work towards a goal of a workforce in which half would be women and half people of colour also appears to have died.
But in Canada, DEI, enforced by the federal regulator and cabinet orders, continues to relentlessly march onward, as our government quietly meddles every bit as effectively as Trump to advance its goals, and the media meekly submits.
Comments (4)
cubsnyder@gmail.com
18 Nov 2025 @ 5:11 am
None of us voted for DEI. I dare the school boards and corporations to put it on the ballot. Let’s hear the rationale and then let us decide whether we want it or not. DEI is reverse racism and undemocratic, or it’s not. Sell it to me, don’t hide it from me or ram it down my throat by making me ineligible for a hire the day I was born. Be the other trans; transparent.
Is Canada's approach to DEI in newsrooms truly 'merit-based' or government-driven?
What are the potential consequences of government intervention in newsroom demographics?
How does the article reconcile the need for diverse newsrooms with the concept of merit?
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) regulates more than 2,000 broadcasters, most of which post news on their websites. It was directed by cabinet just over two years ago to “make any changes to its regulatory framework that are necessary” in order to advance the profile of Indigenous people, official language minorities, equity-seeking and ethnocultural groups.” Equity-seekers include “Black and other racialized persons, persons with disabilities, members of 2SLGBTQI+ communities, women, members of other equity-seeking groups, and Canadians of diverse ethnocultural backgrounds.” The order-in-council mentions “equity-seeking” 11 times and Indigenous an astonishing 44 times. 2SLGBTQI+, while definitely comprehensive, is relatively under-represented with only six mentions. Not surprisingly, the major broadcasters all appear to have CRTC-pleasing DEI policies. Take Bell Media, for example, which, through its Inclusion and Representation Plan, plans on commissioning 50 percent of its original programming from “under-represented groups.” The “arms-length” regulator is also instructed to report on its progress in this regard, which, seeing as it was assigned to oversee implementation of the Online News Act, probably explains why the group chosen to manage the distribution of Google’s $100 million fund—the Canadian Journalism Collective—recently asked recipients about the demographic makeup of their newsrooms. There are 404 corporations, many of which operate multiple stations and newspapers, approved to collect from this fund. Then there’s the CBC. Those who monitored its CRTC license renewal hearing in 2021 will recall that diversity was the primary theme for Canada’s largest news organization, which is all-in on DEI or, as the CBC calls it, EDI—equity, diversity, and inclusion. Its goals with its 2022-2025 plan were to make sure “half of all new hires for executive and senior management positions at CBC/Radio-Canada will be Indigenous Peoples, racialized people, or people with disabilities, retention and promotion rates for Indigenous Peoples, racialized people or people with disabilities will be doubled” and “by 2025, at least one of the key creative roles in all English- and French-language programs will be held by someone who is Indigenous, racialized, a member of LGBTQ2+ communities, or has a disability.” It appears that the broadcaster has blown past its goal with 84.1 percent of new hires now being “Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities, and racialized people”. Whew. Clearly, DEI is not under threat in Canada. The government, its regulator, and its media funding arms are all making sure of that. To be clear, if you are operating a media company and you aren’t working to make sure your staff represents and—this is very important—thinks like the community you are trying to serve, you are a fool and will fail. Yet there are many, including women and others from “equity-deserving” groups, who will argue that, despite its multiple “EDI” initiatives, the CBC lacks the intellectual wingspan to properly serve the constituency that funds it and, even while it may look like it has changed, hasn’t really changed at all. Many years ago, when the demographics of the city I worked in—Calgary—were obviously shifting, those of us in newsrooms tried to keep up, but not because the government told us to. It wasn’t easy. Journalists, despite their largely progressive worldviews, can be extremely hidebound in their ways—but adaptation was considered necessary to remain relevant. The bottom-line belief was that the greater the intellectual diversity (which backgrounds influence) within a newsroom, the more likely it is that the quality and appeal of reporting and commentary would improve. Like any business, journalism must embrace merit and simultaneously aspire to be as diverse in terms of gender, race, etc., as the audience it serves. But only because it is very obviously common sense and absolutely not because it pleases the government and its tentacles, none of which have any business engineering the makeup of the nation’s newsrooms.
Peter Menzies is a commentator and consultant on media, a Macdonald-Laurier Institute Senior Fellow, a past publisher of the Calgary Herald, and a former vice chair of the CRTC
Comments (4)
None of us voted for DEI. I dare the school boards and corporations to put it on the ballot. Let’s hear the rationale and then let us decide whether we want it or not. DEI is reverse racism and undemocratic, or it’s not. Sell it to me, don’t hide it from me or ram it down my throat by making me ineligible for a hire the day I was born. Be the other trans; transparent.